Schools Closer to Industrial Action

Teacher pay talks broke down earlier, today, after Scottish Government and COSLA refused to consider improvements to their previous offer, already rejected by the SNCT as “derisory” and “divisive” at its meeting on 18 September.

Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said that “the prospect of industrial action had moved significantly closer as a result of the Scottish Governments decision to abandon the talks rather than seeking to negotiate a solution. The SSTA had believed the Government when it said it recognises and values the commitment and hard work of its teachers. The SSTA had also expected the Government to recognise the damage the austerity measures had made to the teaching profession and support and reward its teachers appropriately”.

“The SSTA and other unions, had offered constructive proposals for Government and COSLA to consider but in rejecting them out of hand, Ministers have effectively dismissed the concerns of Scottish teachers. It is shameful that Scottish Ministers have walked away from the negotiating table in this manner. The prospect of industrial unrest in Scotland’s schools in the coming months has moved a significant step closer as a result of the Government’s abandonment of talks. Teachers will be disappointed and angry by this latest development.”

The SSTA Salaries Committee has already unanimously rejected the offer, but will consider the insulting response from the Government and determine the terms of the consultative ballot of its members.

[ends]

Further information from
Seamus Searson
General Secretary

0131 313 7300

4 October 2018

Teachers reject Cosla Pay Offer but remain committed to negotiated agreement

Tuesday 27 March 2018

The Teachers’ Side negotiators of the Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers (SNCT) have today (Tuesday) rejected a pay offer of 2% / 3% from local authorities to Scotland’s teachers. The offer was presented by the Employers’ Side of the SNCT at a meeting of the SNCT Extended Joint Chairs group. The Teachers’ Side had submitted a pay claim of 10% for teachers at all grades. Commenting, a spokesperson for the Teachers’ Side of the SNCT said, “The Teachers’ Side negotiators have rejected this offer of 2% / 3% for Scotland’s teachers, as it falls far short of the 10% pay claim that was submitted via the SNCT this year. The Teachers’ Side also rejected any notion of a differentiated deal that would award lower pay increases to teachers at some grades compared to colleagues at other grades. The offer that has been proposed by employers fails to deliver on the need to value education and value teachers by delivering appropriate salaries for Scotland’s teaching professionals.”

The spokesperson continued, “There is a growing crisis in teacher recruitment and retention across Scotland, and declining rates of pay is one of the key factors contributing to this problem. Scotland wants and expects the best teaching professionals but, increasingly, is unwilling to pay appropriate professional salaries to the teachers working in our schools. Pay for Scotland’s teachers is continuing to decline in comparison to other graduate professions and to teacher salaries in other European countries. This simply must be rectified.” The spokesperson added, “The Teachers’ Side remains committed to negotiations via the SNCT in the hope of agreeing a fair deal for Scotland’s teachers. Further talks are planned, via the SNCT, following the Spring holiday period. There is a clear expectation, on the part of the Teachers’ Side, that the Scottish Government, a party to the negotiations, will be required to take a view on the ongoing discussions and to play an active role in reaching a settlement.”

(ENDS)

SSTA Prepares for Industrial Action on Teachers’ Pay in 2018

The SSTA conducted a survey of members on the 2017 pay increase for teachers and their readiness to take action in pursuit of an acceptable pay deal in 2018.

Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said, “At this early stage 96% of SSTA members are prepared to take industrial action for an above inflation pay award in 2018. 64% were prepared to take strike action with a further 32% were prepared to take action short of strike action”

“The survey showed 90% of teachers believed the current pay increase would not encourage teachers to remain in the profession."

“The SSTA member survey highlighted the lack of recognition and the unhappiness of the teaching profession. Although pay is critical in retaining teachers the ‘never ending’ workload is pushing many teachers away from the profession”.

Seamus Searson added “It is very worrying in a time of teacher shortage that 68% of teachers have considered or are considering leaving the profession. The Government must see its priority to retain the experienced teachers we have now. This will only be achieved with a substantial pay rise in 2018 and a radical change to cut teacher workload.

“The Government must be prepared to ask if it can afford to lose more of its experienced teachers if it wishes to maintain education standards”. The survey found that

• 77% of teachers are not content with the 2017 Pay increase
• 95% of teachers believe the 2017 pay increase will not attract more people into teaching
• 89% of teachers believe the 2017 pay increase will not encourage teachers toremain in teaching
• 68% of teachers are considering or have considered a career outside ofteaching
• 50% of teachers are expecting a substantial pay offer in 2018
• 54% of teachers are not expecting changes/reductions in workload in 2018
• 49% of teachers were prepared to take strike action on the 2017 pay increase
• 64% are prepared to take strike action with a further 32% prepared to take action short of strike action should the 2018 pay increase be below the rate of inflation.

Comments from members highlight the situation

The demands and unrealistic expectations of teachers are no longer worth the mediocre pay. I’ll be leaving the profession as soon as I can find a suitable job”.

“I am now poorer than when I started the job in 2007”.

“The proposed pay increase does not reflect the demands of the teaching profession. The proposal is insulting in terms of workload, constant development work and does not show the importance of the teacher and their contribution to society”.

Kevin Campbell, SSTA President added “SSTA members care passionately about the young people they teach and have committed huge effort to give them every opportunity. This commitment needs to be recognised in terms of pay. Unfortunately, teachers’ pay has been allowed to fall to the point that many classroom teachers are unable to “make ends meet” and really struggle to reach pay day each month”

Editor’s note
The SSTA member survey took place over two weeks in December with 1359 responses. The SSTA is preparing its submission for the April 2018 pay claim for discussion at the SNCT teachers’ side meeting on 5 February.

Further information from

Seamus Searson
General Secretary

0131 313 7300

 

social networks

‘The Christmas Mobile Telephone Present’

The SSTA does not wish to dampen the excitement of Christmas and the giving and receiving of presents. Many children and young people will be looking forward excitedly to receiving a mobile telephone for the first time or the latest ‘all singing and dancing ‘model. However, parents need to be aware of their responsibilities in ensuring their children use mobiles correctly and more importantly appropriately”.

Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said, “Today's mobile telephones are a very powerful piece of equipment which if used inappropriately can have an extremely damaging impact upon other children, adults and teachers”

“Early this year SSTA conducted a survey of its members as to the impact of social media upon teachers. 1,180 teachers replied to the survey and the results showed the gaps in pupils, parents and others understanding of the responsibilities of the ownership of a mobile telephone. This is borne out by 25% of teachers having negative experiences of social media due to pupils”.

“Some parents have assumed that the school will carry-out the education of their children in the use and responsibilities that go together with a mobile phone. However, this is not included in the curriculum and most teachers are not trained (71%) with 26% not confident in the use of social media”.

Seamus Searson added “In the first instance it must be the responsibility of the parent to ensure appropriate guidance. No parent would give a motor bicycle to a 13 year-old and say “off you go on the road and enjoy yourself” without taking responsibility for what might happen. Of course not, but why should parents not take the same responsibility for a child with a mobile telephone”.

The survey showed that

  • 26% of teachers did not feel confident or did not use social media
  • 19% of teachers said their school didn’t have a social media policy for teachers with a further 45% not knowing if the school had a policy.
  • 24% of teachers said that their schools didn’t have a social media policy for pupils with a further 58% not knowing if the school had a policy
  • 71% of teachers had not received training by their school/local authority on the use of social media
  • 29% of teachers said pupils in their schools had not been given discrete guidance on the use of ‘social media’

When it came to teachers having negative experiences with social media the survey showed the source of this experience

  • 25% from pupils
  • 8% from parents,
  • 5% from parent/community groups and
  • 9% from other teachers or other members of the school staff.

Kevin Campbell, SSTA President added “Social Media is a fantastic resource if used positively. Unfortunately, some young people and a small selection of parents/community have used it to target teachers and bring their reputation and their character under question or provide a negative picture. This can have devastating and long lasting effects which has had a direct impact on a teacher’s personal life and mental health”.

 

Comments from teachers highlight the situation

“Photograph of a teacher taken in class. The head superimposed onto a naked female and posted on social media”.

“I don't do social media in fear of something happening that I have no control over”.

“Cyberbullying and sexting as well as other complications arising from other inappropriate and risky uses of social media by young people is a constant issue for me as PT Pastoral Care. It is doing huge damage to the lives of our young people”.

“Threatened via Facebook along with many other staff, pupils were encouraged to join a group to "kill" school staff”.

“Most of our fights/arguments between pupils stem from social media then the pupils meet each other face to face in school”.

“A pupil created a Twitter account in my name, including a photograph of me, in which they included a large amount of abuse. This included racist remarks, and ones of a sexual and sexually abusive nature”.

“I have worked as a Guidance Teacher and see the effect of social media on a daily basis between students - bullying is more unpleasant and obsession with popularity worse than ever”.

“I was subjected to horrendous online bullying of a sexual nature from 2 pupils at my school”.

“There is a constant pupil abuse of texting, sexting and sending of indecent images in school.  Together with a lack of acceptance of the consequences of sending inappropriate messages and images despite extensive work through PSE lessons. There is a lack of parental responsibility and knowledge of the damage of social media and its effects on adolescent behaviour”.

“A pupil took a photo of me in school and edited it by adding text saying I was a Paedophile led to a great distress in my professional and personal life”.

“A large number of ‘school refusers’ as a consequence of on-line bullying. Parents are also using this as a form of attack on both children and their families leading to police involvement on numerous occasions”.

“Numerous incidents of photos of a sexually explicit nature been posted by "friends" and gone viral and again led to mental health issues and attendance issues”.

“Also as a general issue pupils unable to be away from the phones for any length of time as they are totally addicted to social media and this causes discipline issues on a daily basis and a lot of stress. Academic performance has been hit and the future of several of the pupils is a major concern”.

 

Further information from

Seamus Searson
General Secretary

0131 313 7300

 

21 December 2017

Teachers demand higher pay and a cut in workload

The SSTA is conducting a survey of members on the proposed pay increase for teachers in 2017-2018 (1% from April with a further 1% from January to March 2018).

Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said, “The initial finding highlights the lack of recognition of the important work that teachers undertake and the unhappiness of the profession. Although pay is critical in retaining teachers the ‘never ending’ workload is pushing many teachers away”.

“The survey showed 90% of teachers believed the current pay increase will not encourage teachers to remain in the profession. The survey confirms the view that many teachers are considering a career outside of teaching (68%).

“There needs to be real recognition and a commitment to focus on the retention of teachers with a significant pay increase instead of looking at new recruits to solve the problem. There is little point in turning on the tap of recruitment when you have forgot to put the plug of retention in the bath”.

Seamus Searson added “at this early stage 66% of members are prepared to take strike action should pay not be increased above inflation in 2018. The recent Scottish Budget will not help teachers as very few will benefit from the changes in tax or proposed lifting of the pay cap”

The initial findings of the survey showed

  • 78% not content with the 2017 Pay increase
  • 96% believe the 2017 pay increase will not attract more people in to teaching
  • 90% believe the 2017 pay increase will not encourage teachers to remain in teaching
  • 68% are considering or have considered a career outside teaching
  • 49% are expecting a substantial pay offer in 2018
  • 53% are not expecting changes/reductions in workload in 2018
  • 50% are prepared to take strike action on the 2017 pay increase
  • 66% are prepared to take strike action should the 2018 pay increase be below the rate of inflation

Comments from members highlight the situation

“The demands and unrealistic expectations of teachers are no longer worth the mediocre pay. I’ll be leaving the profession as soon as I can find a suitable job”.

“I am now poorer than when I started the job in 2007”.

“Money should be used to retain existing highly skilled teachers. I am still paying off a student loan after 14 years of teaching”

“Teachers need a substantial increase and a radical change to workload”

“The proposed pay increase does not reflect the demands of the teaching profession. The proposal is insulting in terms of workload, constant development work and does not show the importance of the teacher and their contribution to society”.

“They are relying on goodwill and I feel that it is time that our goodwill and patience is recognised. Enough is enough and reluctantly it is time for strike action”.

 

Kevin Campbell, SSTA President added “SSTA members care passionately about the young people they teach and have committed huge effort to give them every opportunity. This commitment needs to be recognised in terms of pay. Unfortunately, teachers pay has been allowed to fall to the point that many classroom teachers are unable to make ‘ends meet’ and really struggle to reach pay day each month”

ENDS

Editor’s note 

The member survey began on Monday 11 December and is set to close on Friday 22 December. 932 members had responded to the survey by 15 December.

 

The SNCT meets on 18 December to discuss the pay increase that is due to be paid from April 2017.

 

Further information from

Seamus Searson

General Secretary

0131 313 7300

SSTA opposed to the formation of an Education Workforce Council

The SSTA at its December Council meeting passed a motion to oppose the Deputy First Minister’s proposal regarding the formation of an Education Workforce Council and urges the Government to abandon plans to create such a Council.

 

Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said “The SSTA believes that by removing the GTCS it would be a retrograde step and would compromise the independence and integrity of the GTCS.  This would be to the detriment of the teaching profession in Scotland.

 

“The thrust of ‘Empowering Scotland’s Schools’ in the area of the General Teaching Council (Scotland) seems to be aimed at the dissolution of a world class, self-funded and independent body that registers and maintains teacher standards in Scottish schools.

 

“GTCS is self-funded by teachers and requires full registration before someone can work in our schools. Considering it is one of the few areas in education that is still generally viewed as being world class and a model of good practice due to it ensuring that high standards are met and maintained, it is somewhat curious that it is now under attack”.

 

“The consultation bill says, ‘We intend that the Education Workforce Council for Scotland should operate independently from Scottish Ministers’ (p27) except when it suits ‘We intend to include in the Education Bill a power for Ministers to amend the list of practitioners required to register‘ (p29)”.

 

“The GTCS has many critics but it is democratic, fairly representative and open to all to put themselves forwards to directly influence our professional standards”.

Kevin Campbell, SSTA President concluded

 

“The GTCS was set up in 1965 to counter fears about the number of unqualified teachers in schools. It now seems that the Scottish Government, rather than tackling salary and working conditions that are falling through the floor, see the upholding of professional standards as an obstacle to the insertion of cheap labour into our schools”.

 

ENDS

Further information from:

Seamus Searson
General Secretary

7 December 2017

Education Governance: Next Steps - Empowering Our Teachers, Parents and Communities to Deliver Excellence and Equity for Our Children

The SSTA supports the Government’s determination to bring about improvements in Education by ‘closing the attainment gap’ and giving all young people the opportunity to fulfil their potential. However, the SSTA has argued for a process of review followed by improvements rather than major structural change.

The Government has chosen to use its ‘Governance Review’ as the vehicle to look at the agencies and structures involved in education, but not the structures inside the school that support teaching and learning. Structure is only important insofar as it supports and nurtures teaching and learning in the pupil/teacher relationship.

Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said “The SSTA expected the review to identify the following:

  • A national body to develop teaching materials, resources and strategies to support teachers develop learning in secondary schools. This would prevent the duplication that takes place in every secondary school in Scotland.
  • A review of school management structures that recognises and values the importance of subject specialism and focuses management on teaching and learning.
  • Support systems provided by the Local Authority to remove tasks that do not require the skills and expertise of leaders of teaching and learning.
  • Address the deepening crisis in retaining and recruiting teachers and headteachers in its schools. The Scottish Government needs to acknowledge that teachers working conditions and remuneration have failed to keep pace with the rapidly changing education environment. An urgent need for investment.
  • Reject further delegation of responsibilities and funding to headteachers in schools as this will only worsen the headteacher recruitment crisis. Headteachers want to focus on leading learning and do not need to be forced into spending more time on bureaucracy and administration.
  • The importance of Local Authority in managing the education system. The Local Authorities have the ability to bring together all local services to support pupils and their families in their journey through school. The Local Authority should play an important part in removing burdens and obstacles from teachers and headteachers and allow them to exert all their energies on learning.
  • The need for Local Authorities to collaborate across Authority boundaries to ensure there are a sufficient number of teachers, headteachers and supply teachers in our schools. Good examples of collaboration would be a national supply teacher register, a joint recruitment strategy, developing leadership programmes, and a national professional development network for all education staff.
  • The Inspectorate to focus its efforts upon Local Authorities. The Local Authorities should be the driving force for excellence in schools for all young people. The Inspectorate should seek naturally occurring evidence in the schools to support the work of the Local Authorities”.

“The SSTA accepts that ‘Education Governance: Next Steps’ has addressed many of these expectations but there are a number of areas that may have unintended consequences. Initial concerns are

  • Further delegation to schools and headteachers may lead to a worsening of the headteacher recruitment crisis.
  • The devolving of powers to schools should lead to a different dynamic in the running of the schools. The involvement of the school staff in the direction and decision making of the school will need to be developed.
  • The measures to reduce the leadership role of local authorities in delivering education could remove the schools safety blanket and vital support systems.
  • The introduction of regional bodies will assist some strategic issues but underestimates the difficulty in bringing together very different schools and local authorities. This may lead to another layer of bureaucracy and potential conflict.
  • The proposals to involve parents in the managing of the schools assumes that this is a role to which they aspire. It is currently difficult to get parents involved in schools whereas the focus must be on parents being in partnership with the school to support their children’s learning.

Seamus Searson added “The SSTA will be looking thoroughly at the document in the coming months to ensure the proposals meet the test of improving education. But one important ingredient missing from the proposals is the large Government investment needed to bring about this change. This next step will fall on hard ground as this cannot be delivered by moving the existing education resource around.”

Further Information from

Seamus Searson
General Secretary

0131 313 7300

16 June 2017

SSTA Survey on SQA changes to National 5 Qualifications

In addition to the report in today’s Times Education Supplement (Scotland) the SSTA has written to John Swinney, Deputy First Minister, asking for an urgent review of the changes to National 5 Qualifications introduced by the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) and intended for implementation in 2017-2018 session.

Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said “The SSTA welcomed the decision of the Minister to reduce workload for learners and teachers by making the National 5 Units non-mandatory. However, the solutions announced by SQA on 31 January have not been received well in schools by SSTA members” (see SSTA Survey Report ).

“The survey showed a concern for pupils and a belief that teacher workload will be increased as a result of the changes. The response from members was that 63% believed the proposed SQA changes overall would result in an increase in workload with a further 18% indicated there would be no change to workload”.

Seamus Searson added “The changes have been put through without consultation with the SSTA and most importantly the teachers in the school who have to try and deliver the courses. S3 Pupils have already made course choices without teachers being in the position of the detail and outcomes of the new proposals. At the recent SSTA Council meeting members wanted the whole process to stop but we need to find a practical solution very quickly for the pupils who are moving onto the new courses”.

Euan Duncan, SSTA President concluded “The overriding concern of SSTA members to the changes was for their pupils. Members believed that candidate stress would rise as a consequence of the SQA’s proposals.  Candidates at the margins risked having additional barriers that could reduce their chances of success.  These changes have no done anything to address the Bi level and Tri level courses in many of our secondary schools”.

Teacher comments taken from the SSTA Survey

“All our N5 materials must be revamped from learning outcomes (course booklets, homework, powerpoints, class tests, S3 Exam, S4 Prelims). Worryingly we will not know about these changes until September by the time the timetable will be up and running and we will have no time to develop the materials required”.

“The removal of end of unit tests will not reduce work load as these will have to be replaced by internal testing of some description for reporting. To reduce work load they should remove the assignments in Nat 5 & higher and the AV unit in Nat 4”.

“I have never supported strike action before - but I would do so now as I am at a loss as to understand how these changes are going to improve attainment. I no longer have the confidence in knowing what I am supposed to teach and how!”

“The ‘removal’ of units is great - however - we are almost certainly going to have to continue to teach national 3, 4 and 5 in the same class, and at the moment, for any pupils who end up being national 3 or 4, this means they will still need to have passed unit assessments and so all pupils will have to complete a unit assessment anyway!”

 “I do not see how removing an 'element' of the course to reduce workload and then adding more onto other areas can in any way be deemed a way to reduce teacher workload. Is anybody actually asking teachers on the front line? All the resources and materials we have produced for the assignment over the last few years may now just be put in the bin - a waste (yet again) of time, money and resources”.

“It seems like retaliation for commenting on workload issues; the changes will have little or no effect on workload and the consequences of removing units has a big knock on effect on borderline National 5/ National 4 pupils. In school we are told that all pupils will be entered for National 5 regardless of their ability and then we find great difficulties changing their level when they do not pass the existing Unit assessments”.

The SSTA Survey Report on the can be downloaded at the following link -  SSTA Survey Report

Further information from:

Seamus Searson
General Secretary

 

10 March 2017

SSTA Response to Governance Review

SSTA says ‘Put Pupils First – Give Teachers Time to Teach’

The SSTA would argue for a process of review followed by improvements rather than major structural change in its response to ‘Empowering teachers, parents and communities to achieve excellence and equity in education: A Governance Review’.

The SSTA believe that structural change only diverts energies and resources away from the main challenge of ‘closing the attainment gap’.

Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said “Unfortunately this review does not include the people and the structures in the school that support teaching and learning. The SSTA believes that the Government needs to place the pupil/teacher relationship at the centre. Teachers need to time to teach and the support system needs to focus on the pupil/teacher relationship and remove the burdens and pressures on teachers’ time”.

“The consultation omits to provide an appropriate level of detail in terms of the roles and responsibilities of the various bodies within the education sector – this mitigates against an informed response. It would be unwise to make crucial decisions on the future of education based on the responses from such a consultation”.

Seamus Searson added “Teachers in the classroom should make the decisions about pupils, supported by the Headteacher and the Local Authority. Schools do not need further delegation; if anything Local Authorities should be taking back some of the duties which have been passed onto schools over the past few years due to financial cut backs”.

Euan Duncan, SSTA President concluded “The difficulties recruiting headteachers reflect the growing unmanageability of the post. It is worth noting that, in identifying the scale of the problem, many experienced depute heads have expressed their reluctance to be enticed by headteacher posts. The prospect of further delegation of responsibilities and funding to headteachers in schools will only worsen the headteacher recruitment crisis. The existing Devolved School Management Guidance and Toolkit allows for a significant degree of devolved decision making at school level”.

Extracts from the SSTA Response
The Local Authority is the management arm of the education system. As the elected representative of the community the Local Authority is the body that needs to play its role in supporting the learning taking place in schools, and where necessary seek improvement. It is essential that local schools feel part of the community. The direction of the school should be determined by the community that is able to see the long term plan and benefits.

Education Scotland should be the implementation arm of the Scottish Government. Education Scotland should be the driving force for curriculum development and excellence. It should see itself as responsible and accountable for the delivery of the curriculum in every school. Education Scotland should not be independent of the schools and Local Authorities but working in partnership with and responsible for the education in our schools.

Scottish College for Educational Leadership (SCEL) should not be independent of, but be part of Education Scotland and be a normal part of the partnership with Local Authorities in developing the full potential of the education workforce.

General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS) is essential in maintaining a register of teachers, and setting the professional standards of teachers in Scotland.

However, SSTA sees a conflict in GTCS being responsible for the Student Placement System and Teacher Induction Programme as the GTCS moves away from its regulatory function and begins to fulfil the role of the employer.

Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) is important in its two main roles of accreditation and the awarding qualifications in Scotland. The SQA is not the employer of teachers, but has been allowed to place heavy demands upon teachers and schools that have unbalanced the school system. The SQA through the new regime of National Qualifications has undermined teacher professional judgement, skewed the curriculum and placed impossible burdens on pupils, teachers and schools.

The SSTA's full response to  Empowering teachers, parents and communities to achieve excellence and equity in education: A Governance Review'  can be downloaded here SSTA Full Response to Governance Review

Further information from:

Seamus Searson
General Secretary

Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015: Scotland's Results

The SSTA is disappointed to note that since 2012 Scotland’s scores for 15 year olds in the PISA assessments have dropped from ‘above average’ in reading and science to average, and have remained average in Maths.  While recognising that the ‘average’ standard is high among the large number of OECD countries assessed, Scotland has a long tradition of educational excellence and needs to realise its potential as a front-runner.

Behind the bare figures were a number of interesting responses from Scottish students relating to behaviour, relations with teachers and teacher feedback.  These made it clear that teachers in Scotland are well ahead of their OECD peers in the way that they maintain good order so that learning takes place.  Nearly 45% of students reported that their teacher ‘shows an interest in every student’s learning’ in ‘every lesson’ (compared with about 34% elsewhere), and reported much higher figures of receiving teachers feedback than other students across the OECD.  Reaching learning goals is also a strong feature of Scottish education, again with most pupils agreeing that they receive advice from their teachers more regularly than other OECD students.

Euan Duncan, SSTA President, said, “What we are looking for now is a period of stability.  All the changes that have taken place in recent years have added tremendously to the pressure on teachers and youngsters.  Furthermore, reductions in support staff and shortages of supply teachers have taken teachers away from their core function.  From students’ responses it is clear that there is no shortage of passion or commitment from teachers, and that they are working hard to develop the kind of positive ethos required for good learning to take place. There is no magic solution to improving the downward PISA performance trend, but good starting points will be to provide teachers with very clear aims and sufficient resources with which to achieve them.”

SSTA General Secretary, Seamus Searson, said, “These figures come as no surprise.  SSTA members have been concerned about the effect workload and assessment pressure are having on teachers and youngsters for a while which is why we are now engaged in industrial action.  We need to put pupils first and give teachers time to teach!”

 

Further information from:

Seamus Searson
General Secretary