Category: Information for Members

  • Members Update – Christmas Arrangements for Schools

    Members Update – Christmas Arrangements for Schools

    Members Update – Christmas Arrangements for Schools – 11 December 2020

    The SSTA met with John Swinney, Deputy First Minister this week and urged him to:

    • reconsider the arrangements for Secondary Schools prior to Christmas and
    • delay returning to face-face teaching in January

    in order for everybody to be kept safe over the Christmas period.

    This followed the SSTA letter to Local Authorities asking that schools move to ‘remote learning’ and fulfil their duty of care to keep everybody safe. Please see the SSTA letter ‘Continuing Education and Keeping People Safe at Christmas’ 

    It is our understanding from a reliable source that it was a reluctance among local authorities that measures were not introduced to move to remote learning as suggested in the SSTA letter to CEOs.

    The Deputy First Minister said that he was following the medical and scientific advisers and believed that pupils were safer in school than in the community. The SSTA stated our strong belief that the voice of the class teacher has not being heard. He may not be receiving the message that teachers are struggling and fearful for their families particularly at Christmas. He did accept that remote learning will be necessary in some areas and it may be appropriate in secondary schools particularly with senior pupils. The SSTA stated that, following the decision to cancel examinations in 2021, the pressure on teachers and pupils could now be reduced and allow measures to keep people safe and have a ‘real’ break at Christmas.

    The DFM said he would consider our comments and would be in further discussions at the forthcoming CERG. The SSTA stated our concern that the CERG consisted mainly of policy makers and managers of the education system who do not represent and speak on behalf of teachers.

    The SSTA looks forward to secondary schools been given support to move to ‘remote learning’ where both pupils and teachers work from home. An alternative would be a move to ‘blended learning’ where class sizes are reduced to allow strict physical distancing measures to be put in place with some pupils working at home. These are not ‘lockdown’ measures but measures to continue education and keep people safe.

  • Members Update – 1 December 2020

    Members Update – 1 December 2020

    Examinations 2021

    The SSTA has called for an early announcement as to the arrangements for the Higher and Advanced Higher examinations next summer. The assumption that the examinations should continue as normal ignores the damage that has been inflicted upon all pupils as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic. Teachers and pupils are under severe pressure, trying to ensure all candidates are prepared fully for the examinations next summer, whilst increasing numbers have contracted the virus or are required to isolate because of it. The continuation of the exam diet has the potential to increase the divide between the most disadvantaged and those who are not. Delaying the decision adds more stress and unnecessary pressure on those involved. A decision to focus on teacher assessment that identifies ‘quality rather than quantity’ would reduce the level of anxiety on an already distressed education system. 



    Christmas Break

    The decision to relax measures so that families can meet for Christmas has a number of risks that need to be managed. There have been discussions taking place around the arrangements for schools before and after Christmas. The SSTA believes a common end of term date for schools and a later return to physical schooling would be a sensible measure to protect people and control the virus. In addition, to continue education by moving to ‘remote learning’ at an earlier stage to reduce the risk both before and after Christmas would seem to be a sensible additional measure. This would not mean a return to the ‘lockdown’ measures introduced in March but a planned continuation of learning at the times when schools would be expected to be open. It has been a hard year for all so far so please remember it is essential for all staff and pupils to have a break over Christmas.


    Remote Learning

    Remote learning is the term being used to describe when learners and teachers are not physically present together in the traditional classroom environment. Teachers can arrange learning which is appropriate to the needs and circumstances of their learners.

    Main elements of remote learning can include:

    • providing pupils with physical resources where needed such as learning materials, textbooks and digital devices
    • providing access to recorded learning sessions and tasks (such as Education Scotland and other resource providers)
    • setting learners tasks for completion and submission to / discussion with practitioners
    • engaging with pupils through email or an agreed platform
    • using the opportunity to check in, discuss and engage with pupils following a learning task, but not to deliver lessons or content 

    Please note: Live teaching is a major safety and security issue and should not be taking place.



    Heating and Ventilation
    The regulations for heating in schools have not been changed as a consequence of the pandemic but guidance on ventilation has been added. If classrooms and other school areas do not meet the requirements then alternative arrangements need to be made and, in some instances, may lead to classes or schools being sent home. Please see the details within SSTA Heating and Ventilation Poster.


    Pensions
    The SSTA recently arranged a number of members’ briefings that included a presentation on “Teachers’ Pensions Scheme(s) – Changes to the transitional arrangement to the 2015 schemes” by Stuart McCullough an Independent Financial Advisor. Stuart has kindly agreed for his presentation to be circulated to members, whether they were able to attend or not. Please follow the link to the Presentation 


    SSTA Face Masks
    You should have received an SSTA Face Mask recently from your SSTA School Representative. I would like to thank our school representatives who have carried out this task but, more importantly, for the vital work they have carried out on behalf of members during this very difficult time.

    If you have not received your SSTA Face Mask please contact the SSTA Head Office info@ssta.org.uk

  • FACE COVERINGS – The Official Position

    FACE COVERINGS – The Official Position

    The SSTA has focussed throughout the covid-19 pandemic that safety of staff and pupils must be the first consideration. The SSTA continues to insist that all safety measures (such as face coverings, hand sanitisers/cleaning materials in all classrooms and strict physical distancing) should be in place in all schools.

    There has been reluctance in some quarters to take all necessary steps to protect all staff and pupils during the course of the pandemic. As a consequence, there is much confusion as to what safety measures teachers should take whilst at work particularly in the case of face coverings. A large number of extensive documents have been issued recently and the essential documents have been added below.

    The guidance on face coverings is:

    Levels 0-2

    • Face coverings should be worn by adults where they cannot keep two metres from other adults and/or young people.
    • The “sustained period” 15-minute caveat no longer applies.

    Levels 3-4

    • Face coverings should also be worn at all times by adults and young people in classrooms in senior phase.

    At all Levels

    • face coverings should be used by adults when not working directly with young people
    • Face coverings should be worn by parents and other visitors to the school site
    • Classroom assistants and those supporting children with Additional Support Needs who work within two metres of young people should wear face coverings.

    “…previous advice on face coverings in schools …should be strengthened and augmented to manage the main area of risk within schools, which is adult to adult transmission.  The advice has, therefore, been brought in line with current advice in the community, and the need for compliance should be strongly reinforced.” – COVID-19 Advisory Sub-group on Education and Children’s Issues (30 October 2020) SSTA Face Covering Poster

    Pupils Refusing to Wear Face Coverings
    The SSTA still has a major concern that schools have been placed in an impossible position when pupils refuse to wear face coverings. A large number of members have reported the difficulties the non-compliance of pupils is causing in schools. The SSTA has written to the Deputy First Minister seeking that schools must be fully supported in taking action to ensure full compliance of safety measures in schools. 

    Use of Face Coverings
    Members are reminded about the safety guidance on the use of face coverings. It is vital that clear instructions on how to put on, remove, store and dispose of face coverings to avoid inadvertently increasing the risks of transmission. The key points are as follows:

    • Face coverings should not be shared with others.
    • Before putting on or removing the face covering, hands should be cleaned by washing with soap and water or hand sanitiser.
    • Make sure the face covering is the right size to cover the nose, mouth and chin. Children should be taught how to wear the face covering properly, including not touching the front and not pulling it under the chin or into their mouth.
    • When temporarily storing a face covering (e.g. during classes), it should be placed in a washable, sealed bag or container. Avoid placing it on surfaces, due to the possibility of contamination.
    • Re-usable face coverings should be washed after each day of use in school at 60 degrees centigrade or in boiling water.

    Disposable face coverings must be disposed of safely and hygienically. Children and young people should be encouraged not to litter and to place their face coverings in the general waste bin. They are not considered to be clinical waste in the same way that used PPE may be.

     – Coronavirus (COVID-19): Guidance on reducing the risks from COVID-19 in schools Non-statutory guidance to ensure a safe and supportive environment for learning and teachingVersion 4.3 Published 30 October 2020
    – Coronavirus (COVID-19): public use of face coverings  
    – Safe Learning in Scotland: Building on our Success (Education Scotland)

    – Advice from The Covid-19 Advisory Sub-Group On Education And Children’s Issues

    SSTA Face Covering
    The SSTA is providing all members with a face covering that will be sent out shortly. To get yours please ensure your personal details are correct.

  • Lockdown Learning Depended on Teachers’ Resources and Resourcefulness

    Lockdown Learning Depended on Teachers’ Resources and Resourcefulness

    The Scottish Secondary Teachers’ Association, Scotland’s specialist union for secondary teachers, recently carried out a survey of its members to establish the extent to which they felt employers had ensured they had the right ICT tools for the job both during and since lockdown.  Over 1900 secondary teachers from all over Scotland responded.

    The pandemic has brought the use of educational ICT into sharp focus.  Teachers have been relying on ICT to maintain contact with colleagues and learners in a safe and secure way which allows learning to continue in a virtual environment.  It was essential during lockdown.  It continues to be essential for teachers and learners who are required to self-isolate.

    As well as for facilitating school meetings, teachers have been using ICT for a range of other purposes including:

    • Google classroom,
    • Microsoft Teams,
    • access to GLOW (Scotland’s digital learning platform),
    • creatively developing learning resources,
    • management tasks (eg providing SQA exam data, timetabling, SEEMIS),
    • tracking and responding to student work,
    • mandatory SQA training,
    • professional learning (eg webinars, online training),
    • contacting learners’ families (email, telephone),
    • looked-after children’s reviews and social work meetings,
    • college and university applications,
    • maintaining communication with families through school websites and social media.

    Although education would have ground to a halt without ICT during lockdown, remarkably less than half of teachers were provided with any kind of hardware during lockdown.  Some equipment provided was inadequate.   The vast majority of respondents (90%) reported having to use their own hardware, such as laptops/PCs/phones/printers to maintain continuity of education.  Over 56% dipped into their own pockets to purchase essential items such as webcams, printer consumables, office equipment, new laptops and upgrades.  Teachers covered the cost of telephone and broadband connections themselves.  In many cases teachers spent £100 or more, with some reporting having had to spend many hundreds of pounds on new equipment.  Fewer than 1% of respondents have had any of their additional costs reimbursed.

    The survey revealed that teachers need home access to good quality ICT such as PCs, laptops and tablets which allow them to connect to school networks.  Unfortunately most local authorities were simply not ready for the challenges of lockdown.  Around two-thirds of respondents agreed that equipment should be provided by their employer, although about a third expressed a willingness to pay for it themselves if it could be purchased with assistance, eg at ‘cost’ through the local authority.

    Euan Duncan, SSTA Assistant General Secretary said,

    “Expecting teachers to provide, from their own pockets, resources which are essential for high quality learning and teaching to take place is simply unacceptable. Although there is evidence of some improvement since schools reopened, even now we are finding situations where employers are asking teachers to use their own devices to contact families.”

    James Cowans, SSTA Education Committee Convener said,

    “Teachers rose to the challenge of online teaching rapidly generally using their own resources and resourcefulness, but it remains that time needs to be set aside for teachers to develop their pedagogical skills further in relation to the use of ICT.  With the uncertainty still surrounding the spread of the virus, and with National 5 exams cancelled, employers must review teachers’ ICT provision and training as a matter of urgency.  Local authorities must refresh their ICT strategy thereby ensuring that young people are not disadvantaged by teachers’ lack of access to well-connected ICT.”

    A variety of respondents commented:

    • It was simply presumed that teachers would have access to devices to enable them to do their duties.
    • The item was very old and dated in its specification and was often more of a hindrance than a help.
    • I couldn’t access many of the usual facilities and systems which I have in school. We were all guessing how teams works, for example, which added enormously to stress levels.
    • It really was a nightmare to upload work or attachments using my iPad. So painfully slow and frustrating. If blended learning is to be a thing moving forward, my employer seriously needs to up their game in terms of ICT. The ICT situation at school is bad enough, never mind the provision for home working.
    • Pupil Support/Guidance needs mobile phones to engage with parents/carers. Using our own mobiles because the “school can’t afford to issue staff mobiles” is unacceptable.
    • It was taken for granted I could use my free minutes and internet to get work done. I pay for those contracts and effectively I am paying to work as those are not paid for by my employer.
    • My employer refreshed all our hardware to laptops before lockdown so it was easy to access and could be used at home.
    • This is an equity issue for both staff and pupils across Scotland. Colleagues in other areas provided Chromebooks etc by their schools and likewise some state schools provide iPads/similar to all pupils. In a household with 2 adults employed as teachers and 2 High School aged children our own resources very stretched despite being relatively well provided for. WiFi issues notwithstanding provision of laptops to all teaching staff would have helped to ease this.
    • I’m expected to buy/have my own hardware but I’m really struggling financially.
    • We were reluctantly loaned laptops- which had small screens and no mouse – not particularly useful for excel sheets needed to make up our rank order for SQA certification process.
    • There is currently no budget for printing or photocopying in my school. I do ALL printing and photocopying at home which is paid out of my family budget.
    • We were given nothing at all. The school didn’t have any laptops to give out. There was no warning and we didn’t know if school was closed/working from home/what the pupils had to do. ….. we are still in the same situation now where there is no help when it happens again.


    SSTA Education Committee

    11 November 2020

  • Safety Measures in Schools are Putting Teachers at Risk

    Safety Measures in Schools are Putting Teachers at Risk

    The SSTA conducted a survey of SSTA School Representatives on the measures being used in schools to keep staff safe. The survey highlighted the inconsistent approach to staff safety taken by local authorities across Scotland.

    Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said

    “The SSTA has argued for a consistent approach to safety during this crisis but unfortunately some local authorities are interpreting the guidance as optional rather than mandatory”.

    “Safety in School must be the first priority. SSTA conducted a survey of school representatives and found an inconsistent approach in schools across Scotland. The SSTA is demanding that the Government set a good example and ensure the highest standards of safety across all schools in Scotland”.

    “Physical distancing and the wearing of face coverings are essential parts of keeping people safe and must be the starting point in all schools”.

    One rep said “Face coverings are a particular concern at our very large secondary. Pupils are actively defying government guidance and school management has failed to implement and reiterate guidance effectively. The lack of consequences for students is adding to members’ anxiety and stress levels as they do not feel safe at work”.

    Another rep said “Pupils not wearing masks in communal areas and ordinary staff trying to enforce this is being met with abuse etc. No consequences apparent for not doing so. Complacency over cleaning and hand anti-bacterial by pupils now. We need stronger measures in place. It’s a nightmare”.

    Seamus Searson, added  “The Government is due to publish updated guidance for schools in the coming days but the SSTA fears that many measures are likely not to be mandatory. Teachers are desperate for clear definitive measures to keep all staff and pupils safe. Unfortunately, too many Local Authorities and schools choose to see the guidance as optional especially if extra costs are involved. The Government needs to step up and ensure the highest standards and provide all the finance necessary to keep schools open”.

    “The Government must also be prepared to reduce the numbers of pupils attending school or closing schools to keep both pupils and staff safe”.
     
     (Please note: Further comments from reps can be found at the end of this message)
     
    SSTA Survey Main Findings

    • The SSTA survey showed that 38% of schools had mostly introduced measures of physical distancing around the school with 12% of schools having no physical distancing measures at all. 49% had introduced some measures around the school.
    • Physical distancing in classrooms 28% of most secondary schools had introduced physical distancing measures in classrooms. 15% had none at all while a further 49% had some.
    • 64% of senior pupils mostly wore face coverings around the school with 69% of junior pupils mostly wearing face coverings around the school.
    • Only 2% of all pupils wore face coverings in classrooms whilst 53% of senior classes and 49% of junior pupils wore no face coverings at all in classrooms.
    • 94% of staff mostly wear face coverings around the school
    • 21% of staff mostly wearing face coverings in classrooms with a further 63% sometimes wearing face coverings in classrooms.
    • 27% of schools provided no face coverings for staff and 15% provided no face coverings for pupils

    The SSTA recommends that all employers ensure that

    • Physical distancing measures must be in place in all school areas, including staff rooms and classrooms, reducing class sizes where necessary.
    • Face coverings are provided for all staff and must be worn in all areas including classrooms.
    • Face coverings are provided for all pupils and must be worn in all areas including classrooms
    • People who refuse to wear a mask must not be allowed to attend school. Medical reasons are the exception with additional safety measures.
    • Plastic screens to be placed in classrooms where physical distancing is difficult and where staff request them.
    • Staff should not be required to share equipment, especially ICT equipment
    • All staff meetings are conducted remotely
    • Visitors must not be allowed in schools unless absolutely necessary.
    • Vulnerable staff should be protected and work from home where appropriate.
    • Provision of cleaning materials in every classroom.
    • Regular risk assessment completed for all student and supply teachers. They need to be adequately prepared with the current guidelines to adhere to school policy.

    Comments from Members

    “There is limited use of face coverings by pupils and limited enforcement by SMT at entry to school and other areas”.

    “There is really poor ventilation of rooms given recent decrease in temperatures and heating is not on in school yet, so if windows or vents open rooms are exceptionally cold”.

    “Positive behaviour policy has been deemed fit for purpose by HT and has not been changed to allow different “sanctions” as a result of failures to adhere to new covid safety measures”.

    “Pupils make little or no attempt to maintain social distancing on the whole”.

    “While provisions are in place for social distancing and pupils are supposed to wear masks between classes, this cannot be enforced (headmaster has admitted this) and many ignore the rules”.

    “Once in class pupils don’t wear face coverings and are arranged in rows; my desks in the Chemistry lab were in fact further apart prior to lockdown but were changed as pupils shouldn’t face each other”.

    “I wish the government would just come clean and say that teachers will have to remain at their work even if COVID-19 spreads through schools they are being disingenuous!”

    “Already guidance from council is suggesting that as long as teachers are wearing face coverings in class, that will be enough to stop them self-isolating, even if they have been in contact with pupils testing positive for COVID-19”.

    “The school is implementing social distancing but it is VERY hard with pupils to genuinely keep this distance, they just keep coming up to you and you have to keep reminding them”.

    “Social distancing in school corridors and classrooms non-existent. About 20% of pupils wear facemasks in corridors”.

    “There has been a laid back attitude by management around the corona virus. Staff are expected to bring in their own masks. Very large numbers of pupils do not wear any masks at any time – a remarkably large number have become asthmatic during lockdown! Social distancing is only in place in dining areas – there has been no sanctions for pupils not remaining in their assigned areas”.

    “HT wants it similar to last year with little/no alterations or consideration for the current situation. Health and well-being of staff was a serious topic during lockdown however it’s no longer a consideration as we are ‘back to normal’. Very worrying”.

    “Pupils not wearing masks in communal areas and ordinary staff trying to enforce this is being met with abuse etc. No consequences apparent for not doing so. Complacency over cleaning and hand anti-bacterial by pupils now. We need stronger measures in place. It’s a nightmare”.

    SSTA School Representative Survey Results – October 2020

    A summary of the School Representatives Survey Results can be downloaded here.

  • SSTA Members Briefing

    SSTA Members Briefing

    The SSTA has arranged briefing sessions for members on the challenges facing secondary teachers at this time.
     
    The General Secretary Seamus Searson will give the latest information regarding Covid-19, national qualifications and the OECD senior phase review. There will also be a presentation on the impact of the Teachers’ Pensions consultation by Stuart McCullough, Independent Financial Advisor from Llife Ltd.
     
    The briefings will be conducted remotely and will take place on:

    Please select the briefing you would like to attend and complete the registration form to book your place using the links above.

  • Pension Consultation – closes 11 October 2020

    Pension Consultation – closes 11 October 2020

    The Government are currently consulting with all members of the public sector pension schemes which includes the Scottish Teachers Pension Scheme. This is regarding the unjustified age discrimination in relation to the transitional arrangements to the 2015 pension scheme.
     
    Within the consultation they are asking you, the scheme member, to make a choice. It’s very important that you understand what this choice is and the implications that it could have. The consultation paper is 74 pages long and can be summarised in one question.
     
    Background
    In 2015 a new Public Sector Career Average Pension Scheme was launched. Depending on your age you were

    1. placed into the career average scheme on the 1 April 2015
    2. given ‘linear taper relief’ which meant that there was a delay before you were moved into the career average scheme or
    3. given protected status which meant that you did not have to go into the new scheme.

    Following the McCloud case the Court of Appeal ruled the pension reforms unlawfully discriminated against young members. The government accepted that it was discriminatory on grounds of age and that the situation must be remedied.

    Remedy
    The government has interpreted the court ruling that members who were in their original scheme prior to the 1 April 2012 will have the ability to have any service accrued under the new scheme transferred back to their original scheme, up to the 31 March 2022.

    At that point, any future benefits accrued by the member will be allocated to the Career Average Scheme that was launched in 2015.

    Whilst this is an interesting interpretation of the court ruling, further negotiations on this point are continuing. It’s important to note that this is not the question asked in the consultation.

    Consultation
    The choice you are being given is that

    1. you should make the selection for your benefits to be moved back to your legacy scheme at the end of the remedy period (31 March 2022) or
    2. you have the ability to delay this choice until the date you decide to retire.

     
    The Government’s Preferred Choice
    The governments preferred choice is that you, the member, make the “immediate choice” as to whether you feel your benefits would be better in your original scheme or the Career Average 2015 scheme. Their argument is that this will help them calculate the funding of the schemes going forward.
     
    The SSTA Position
    The SSTA Salaries, Pensions and Conditions of Service Committee has considered the consultation and is of the view that it is impossible for you to know which outcome would be best as you will only know your personal situation at the point of retirement.
     
    The SSTA would therefore urge you to vote for the “deferred choice underpinned”. This will give you the right, at retirement, to choose the best option that suits you as opposed to the option that suits the government and the pension scheme.
     
    The SSTA will be submitting a detailed response to the government consultation.
     
    How to participate in the consultation
    The consultation closes on the 11 October 2020 and we would encourage all members of the pension scheme to indicate their choice.
     
    Your response can be submitted by email using the following address:
     
    PensionsRemedyProjectConsultation@hmtreasury.gov.uk
     
    Alternatively you can send your response by post to:—
     
        Pensions Remedy Project Team
        HM Treasury
        2/Red
        1 Horse Guards Road
        London
        SW1A 2HQ
     
    You need to give your name and your superannuation number (GTCS number).
     
    The SSTA suggests you use the attached wording as there is no prescribed format or form that has been provided.
     
    “I am responding as an individual in relation to the consultation addressing the unjustified age discrimination in relation to the transitional arrangements to the 2015 pension scheme.
     
    Following the Court Judgement discussed in the consultation document I wish to express my disappointment at the Government’s interpretation as I do not believe that the proposed action provides adequate remedy.
     
    The legal definition of remedy is “a way of using the legal system to make sure that someone’s rights are not taken away from them.” 
     
    The Government has previously set a precedent. It has changed public sector pension schemes on numerous occasions over the last 20 years. Up to and including the pension reforms of 2007/08 any new schemes launched were available to new members, allowing existing members to remain in their legacy scheme.
     
    As it is the proposal that legacy members will be forced into a new pension on 1st April 2022 this will be discrimination on grounds of age which means that remedy has not been given.
     
    In response to question 6 my view is that the “delayed choice underpin” is the fairest of the two options but fails to recognise the rationale of being forced into a new pension.”
     
    You can find links below to the Consultation Paper as well as a brief presentation, produced by the Government Actuary’s Department, for your information and if you have any questions or queries please feel free to contact the Association.

  • SSTA Safety First – School Return Survey

    SSTA Safety First – School Return Survey

    Employers need to take their duty of care seriously

    The SSTA conducted a survey of members to gauge their concerns following the return of all pupils to school.  The survey highlighted the inconsistent approach to staff safety taken by local authorities across Scotland.

    Seamus Searson, SSTA General Secretary said

    “It is particularly worrying that 53% of members in Glasgow were not confident in keeping safe following the return of schools but in East Dunbartonshire and Inverclyde the number fell to 22% of members. Staff confidence in keeping safe can only be achieved when all employers ensure that all measures to keep staff safe are put in place, which in turn will keep schools open”

    “The SSTA survey showed that local authorities are reluctant to take their responsibilities as employers of teachers seriously to ensure the highest levels of safety during this Covid-19 pandemic. It appears that some local authorities are more intent upon saving money than protecting staff. It cannot be acceptable for safety measures in one authority to be different to another. Members reported that physical distancing measures around the school were best in schools in West Lothian at 86% with the worst 46% in East Ayrshire”.

    “A basic safety measure to reduce staff sharing equipment in schools is being ignored as 93% of teachers in South Lanarkshire are expected to share ICT equipment whilst only 19% of teachers do so in Highland. More than 70% of teachers are expected to share ICT equipment in schools. Schools need to ensure teachers are provided with personalised ICT equipment so that they can control their own safety. The provision of face coverings for staff ranged from 78% in Dumfries & Galloway down to only 4% in Argyll & Bute.  Equally, we are aware of schools that are enforcing the wearing of face coverings whilst others are leaving it to the individual. Safety is not optional”

    “The provision of safe work areas for teachers varies considerably with only 24% in South Lanarkshire allocated a safe space whilst in East Lothian 67% of members reported having been allocated safe work areas”.

    “Should employers fail to identify the risks and put measures in place to keep staff safe then they will only have themselves to blame should those same staff need to take time off because of Covid-19. Passing the blame for teacher absences and threatening financial penalties for schools, as Glasgow did this week is not acceptable. Teachers are professionals and deserve a consistent approach to safety. The duty of care lies with the employer (the local authorities) and they need to put safety first”.

    “The SSTA has argued for a consistent approach to safety during this crisis but unfortunately some local authorities are interpreting the guidance as optional rather than mandatory”.

    The SSTA recommends that all local authorities ensure that

    • Physical distancing measures are in place in all school areas, especially staff rooms and classrooms
    • Face coverings are provided for all staff and worn in all areas including classrooms
    • Plastic screens to be placed in classrooms where physical distancing is difficult and where staff request them
    • Enhanced cleaning regimes with additional cleaners employed
    • Staff not be required to share equipment, especially ICT equipment
    • All staff meetings are conducted remotely
    • Visitors must not be allowed in schools unless absolutely necessary. If necessary, strict rules and restricted safe areas for visitors must be provided

    Main Findings of SSTA Survey

    Not confident in keeping Safe in the workplace
    Teachers were not confident of keeping safe after returning to school in Glasgow (53%), North Lanarkshire (52%), Clackmannanshire and East Renfrewshire (both 50%). At the other end of the scale members not confident in keeping safe reduced in East Dunbartonshire and Inverclyde (both 22%)

    When it came to individual schools keeping staff safe East Renfrewshire (34%), Argyll & Bute (32%), Clackmannanshire and Glasgow (both 30%) were not confident. At the other end of the scale staff in Midlothian, Stirling (both 11%) and Highland (10%) lack of confidence was reduced.

    Physical Distancing
    The SSTA survey showed that some areas were better in introducing physical distancing measures around the school with West Lothian (86%), Angus (83%) and Moray (80%) whilst at the end of the scale Dumfries & Galloway (55%) North Ayrshire (50%) and East Ayrshire (46%). In Independent schools 88% had introduced such measures.

    When it came to physical distancing in teaching areas Angus (90%), Aberdeen City (84%) and West Lothian (84%) came out on top whilst South Lanarkshire (46%), Clackmannanshire (45%) and East Ayrshire (37%) were far behind.

    Face Coverings
    Staff being provided with face coverings Dumfries & Galloway (78%), Midlothian (73%) and Scottish Borders (67%) with the employer providing the lowest East Dunbartonshire, Glasgow, North Lanarkshire (all on 11%), East Ayrshire (7%) and Argyll &Bute (4%).

    Teacher Work Areas
    East Lothian, Highland (67%) and Moray (65%) provided teachers with work areas with appropriate physical distancing whilst Glasgow (29%), East Renfrewshire (28%) and South Lanarkshire (24%) providing the least.

    ICT Equipment
    High numbers of staff are expected to share ICT equipment with South Lanarkshire (93%), East Dunbartonshire (91%) and East Renfrewshire (87%). While staff were least required to share ICT equipment in Aberdeen City (43%), Perth & Kinross (41%) and Highland (19%).

    [Ends]
     
    Please see the attached document for the range of responses by local authority
    Please note: The survey was completed at the beginning of September and had 2,058 member responses. Some areas not included due to low level of response.

  • Safety First and the Education Recovery Year

    Safety First and the Education Recovery Year

    Safety First

    Schools have been attempting to adapt to the Covid-19 pandemic but they are far from being complete. Some schools have been more successful than others but there remain many challenges ahead.

    Some progress has been made in recent weeks but the recent SSTA survey highlighted a number of areas that are not been adequately addressed in all schools. The lack of physical distancing, inadequate cleaning regimes, the lack of face coverings and a lack of consistency of safety measures. The SSTA continues to press the Scottish Government and employers to introduce measures to keep staff and pupils safe. The priority must be ‘Safety First’ of all staff and pupils. The SSTA has updated its guidance and recommendations on measures to keep staff safe 

    The Education Recovery Year

    This school year has been labelled the ‘Education Recovery Year’ and the main priority for all schools during this national emergency is to support all the pupils who have suffered because of ‘lockdown’. All schools have been promised additional teachers to assist teaching and learning during this academic year. This should mean a reduction of class sizes and additional support for pupils that have missed out the most during lockdown. This is not a ‘normal’ school year and many of the tasks that have been expected of schools should be stood down in preference of supporting teaching and learning. The SSTA will also be urging the Scottish Government not to reintroduce school inspections this year. Please see the SSTA advice here.

  • SSTA Position Paper: Rapid Review of National Qualifications experience 2020

    SSTA Position Paper: Rapid Review of National Qualifications experience 2020

    On 11 August Deputy First Minister John Swinney announced that an Independent Review, led by Professor Mark Priestley of Stirling University, would be commissioned to look at events following the cancellation of this year’s examination diet.   Given the urgency, the DFM asked for an initial report with recommendations on how things should go forward this coming year to be made within five weeks. 
     
    A panel including SSTA members met with Professor Priestley last week.  Additionally, the SSTA Education Committee responded to Professor Priestley’s request for a position paper with the attached.  It is anticipated that a confidential draft report on findings will be presented to ministers next week, with a final report published by 30th Sept 2020.